Dog Allegedly Beaten in Parking Lot: Demand Maximum Penalties and Lifetime Animal Ban

Target: E. Nelson Chipman, Jr., Prosecuting Attorney, Marshall County, Indiana.

Goal: Seek the maximum legally permitted penalties, a lifetime ban on animal ownership, court-ordered counseling, and restitution in the alleged dog-beating case.

A distressing report indicates a man struck a dog in a fast-food parking lot before leaving the scene in a vehicle. Witnesses told responding officers that the dog was hit, prompting an animal-cruelty charge alongside other offenses. The dog’s condition at the scene was not publicly detailed, yet the described violence is alarming and, if proven, warrants strong action.

According to police summaries, officers stopped a vehicle after it left the lot and arrested a suspect on an unrelated warrant, then added animal-cruelty and other charges tied to the incident. The female companion at the scene declined to provide details, but witness statements described the dog being hit. This remains an active case, and all parties are presumed innocent unless proven otherwise.

Animal-abuse cases involving public violence signal broader safety concerns and demand vigorous prosecution. When authorities pursue meaningful penalties—including jail where warranted, mandatory psychological evaluation and counseling, and a strict, long-term prohibition on animal possession—they help deter repeated harm. In this case, prosecutors should seek the toughest lawful outcome, require restitution for any veterinary care, and ask the court to bar the defendant from contact with animals if guilt is established.

PETITION LETTER:

Prosecutor Chipman,

We are writing about reports that a man struck a dog in a parking lot and then left in a vehicle before being stopped by police. Witnesses described the abuse, and an animal-cruelty charge has been filed alongside other offenses. This incident has understandably upset residents who expect meaningful protection for companion animals.

Public, violent acts toward animals can be precursors to wider harm. We therefore urge your office to pursue the maximum penalties permitted by Indiana law if the evidence supports conviction. Please also request a lifetime ban on animal ownership, court-ordered counseling or anger-management treatment, and restitution for any veterinary costs associated with the dog’s care.

Strong, visible prosecution in cases like this deters future cruelty and affirms the community’s standards. We respectfully ask you to seek a sentence that reflects the gravity of the alleged conduct and safeguards animals going forward.

Sincerely,

[Your Name Here]

Photo credit: John Phelan

Please share and discuss this cause on social media. Spreading the word is essential to the success of this petition:
Why Comments Are Temporarily Disabled

Due to strict advertising policies enforced by our ad provider, we’ve had to temporarily disable the comments section on all petitions. This change was necessary to protect our ability to continue reaching millions of animal advocates around the world.

We believe in the power of community voices, and we hope to bring comments back permanently and without restrictions. But to do that, we need to reduce our reliance on ad revenue.

The best way to support independent animal advocacy, and help us remove ads altogether, is by becoming a Premium Member.

With your help, we can protect animals and free our platform from corporate ad constraints.

Can’t upgrade now? You can still help by sharing this petition:

1077 Signatures

  • Kym Cooper
  • Michelle Collar
  • Diana Ossana
  • Claudia Solorzano
  • Maria Teresa Abellan Arnandis
  • Lisa Siegrist
  • Estefanía Alsina Martín
  • Mary Ann Nordheimer
  • Nalini Cherian
  • Jackie Candela
1 of 108123...108
Skip to toolbar