Ban Cosmetic Testing on Animals

guinea pig - Thye Chuah

Target: Representative Joseph Pitts, Chairman of the House of Representatives Subcommittee on Health

Goal: End cruel cosmetic testing on animals with a country-wide ban on the practice and sale of products tested on animals.

A ban on cosmetic testing on animals was introduced to the U.S. House of Representatives by Representative Martha McSally of Arizona. Not only would the bill ban testing on animals, it would also ban the sale and transportation of such products within the United States. More than 30 nations have taken action to ban cosmetic testing on animals. However, several developed nations, including Canada and the United States, have yet to put an end to this outdated and cruel practice.

During cosmetic testing, small animals such as rabbits, guinea pigs, and mice are exposed to ingredients found in cosmetics like lipstick, shampoo, and nail polish. To test a product’s skin and eye irritation, products are rubbed on animals, while others may be force-fed to animals in order to test for everything from birth defects to causes of death.

There are countless alternatives to animal testing. Companies can produce products with safe materials instead of testing new materials on animals. They can also use science’s technical advancements to replace the use of animals with more modern and cruelty-free options, like artificial skin that replaces the need for animal skin.

Representative McSally’s proposed legislation would put an end to cosmetic testing on defenseless animals. Countless nations have already taken steps to end this inhumane practice. It is America’s turn to ban animal testing. Sign the petition to voice your support for Representative McSally’s bill, which is currently sitting in the House of Representatives’ Subcommittee on Health, where is has remained for over a year.


Dear Representative Pitts,

Over a year ago, Representative Martha McSally introduced a law that would ban the testing of cosmetics on animals in addition to banning any sale or transportation of such cosmetics. If this bill was made into a law, America would join more than 30 other nations on a growing list of countries banning animal testing.

Millions of defenseless animals like rabbits, guinea pigs, and mice would be spared from cruelty such as purposeful skin and eye irritation and death. In this scientifically advanced age, there is no reason animals should still be used in laboratories to test nail polish and lipstick.

However, the bill has remained inactive in your Subcommittee on Health. I ask you and the other members of the committee to take action on this bill so that is has a better chance of becoming law and so that this cruel and outdated practice can be brought to an end.


[Your Name Here]

Photo credit: Thye Chuah

Sign the Petition

  • Only your name will be displayed. By signing, you accept our terms and may receive updates on this and related causes.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
FacebookCare2 NewsTwitterEmailShare


  1. Linda Barnett says:

    If cosmetics are for human use, then testing should be carried out on humans NOT vulnerable, voiceless and innocent animals. Man does not have the right to USE creatures for ANY testing. In this the 21st century man has the technology to carry out testing NOT using any life, man or beast!

  2. This country should be ashamed that testing on animals is still legal. This should have been banned years(decades, actually)ago.
    The prisons are full of wastes of life, many deserving of torture, use them if you need to test on living beings.

  3. Lisa Allred Lisa Zarafonetis says:

    Signed & Shared❗️?

  4. Great bill, but a much FASTER fix would be if even more people would just STOP BUYING ANY PRODUCTS that:
    1) were tested on animals
    2) had any of their INGREDIENTS tested on animals
    3) used animal co-products

    CONSUMERS have to stop remaining so bloody lazy, ignorant, uncaring, and uncommitted to FORCE change upon companies and society as a whole!

  5. Keep in mind that not only is this vile, cruel & unconscionable, these “testings” are UNNECESSARY — they’re NEEDLESS — they serve absolutely NO purpose — we have alternatives — humane methods NOT using animals AT ALL — pay a visit to PCRM for the latest data on NOT USING animals.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *




6379 Signatures

  • Taylor Hernandez
  • Estrella Garcia
  • Jambrina Sakellaropoulo
  • Emily McDonald
  • Fateh Sidhu
  • Paula Freeman
  • joanne Nelson
  • Janet Lyons-Fairbanks
  • Elizabeth Fleming
  • brigid mccormick
1 of 638123...638
Skip to toolbar